WHEN THE WHITE MAN CEASES TO RULE - THIS IS THE TRAGIC RESULT

[spunkloaf]

Scarlett.  god dammit.

[BIGTEX]

BIGTEX offers Mr. Grumpy as Exhibit "A" attached to the treatise:  RESOLVED:  Liberalism is fascism without the humor.

Mrs. Grumpy:  Perhaps when your menstrual cycle ceases you will be freed of "the vapors" and might find it within yourself to respond to Mr. TEX with facts instead of emotion.

BIGTEX would not bet that is the case, however.

Perhaps modern pharmacology can provide the means for you to legally spare yourself the effects of your lamentable illness. 

BIGTEX has never found a study which indicates, however, a cure, pharmacological or otherwise, that would increase your intelligence.

Sorry that you were born thusly disadvantaged.

[gorknoids]

beautiful, what kind of absolute dumb ass are you?  this is not a debate, there is no debate.  you are a pinhead racist who cloaks his skinhead bs in bs.  be honest if possible.  what are some sexually frustrated disconnected teen, cruising the neighborhood in mommie's minivan, cursing blacks and counting pimples??  what happened did some black kid steal your girl/boy friend?  you can't be older than 15 or so, how else could your ego be so out of whack and completely disproportionate to your sadly demonstrated intellect.  come back in a few years when you have some real life experiences to share.     

Damn!  I just got here, but you have nailed this needle-dick.  Kind'a ballsy of you, BTW.  He DOES capitalize his moniker, and you know how tough those guys are.   

[']

see i think grumpy is going to have more to say in the morning...you aint seen nuthin yet!!

[gorknoids]

I can't wait.  I would skip scrogging Lindsay Lohan to watch it in real time. 

[they call me MR. GRUMPY god damn it!]

liltaint it is clear that you aren't and never were.  i am sure that you thump your lil bitch tits all the way to the nearest kmart white sale...  the only fact here is that you highlight yourself as teeny weeny bigot, who for some reason believes he/she is superior to others based upon the color of his/her skin.   
exhibit a:  "when the white man ceases to rule - this is the tragic result"   there is a simple silliness to this that is tragic.  in you we have found the origin of "stuck on stupid"    

[spunkloaf]

{-APPLAUSE-}    {-APPLAUSE-}

[SDML]

SDML There I go offending your sensibilities again. Sorry, man. Let me rephrase: The Black African was not ready for self rule.

Offending my sensibilities? No, there you go being unconsciously racist again. What makes you or Tex think being black has anything to do with it? Did the Soviet Union fall due to the incompetence of the Caucasian in the Ear-Asian geographic area? The jump to racial cause is an astoundingly ridiculous leap of logic.

It would behoove you well to examine your fundamental assumptions. As for Tex, not sure if those are unconscious assumptions or if he is unapologetically racist.

Where was I being unconsciously racist and where does the Soviet Union fit into this?

So, Black rule has been just dandy and the African colonies were ready for independence? No, that can't be what you meant because my "fundamental assumptions" (known as the dreaded facts) were spot on. 

You are often quite bright, Mr. D, and enjoyable to read. But your failure to honestly examine your own words is tiresome.

Your "fundamental assumption" is that you decided (consciously or unconsciously) to validate the qualifier "black". That is, you feel race (as opposed to, say, gender or sexual orientation or education or shoe size) is a relevant factor in the dismal conditions in Rhodisia. Of course, I already stated this above.

Scarlett - If you agree with everything he says, you are clearly racist.

[Mr. Dirlewanger]

SDML There I go offending your sensibilities again. Sorry, man. Let me rephrase: The Black African was not ready for self rule.

Offending my sensibilities? No, there you go being unconsciously racist again. What makes you or Tex think being black has anything to do with it? Did the Soviet Union fall due to the incompetence of the Caucasian in the Ear-Asian geographic area? The jump to racial cause is an astoundingly ridiculous leap of logic.

It would behoove you well to examine your fundamental assumptions. As for Tex, not sure if those are unconscious assumptions or if he is unapologetically racist.

Where was I being unconsciously racist and where does the Soviet Union fit into this?

So, Black rule has been just dandy and the African colonies were ready for independence? No, that can't be what you meant because my "fundamental assumptions" (known as the dreaded facts) were spot on. 

You are often quite bright, Mr. D, and enjoyable to read. But your failure to honestly examine your own words is tiresome.

Your "fundamental assumption" is that you decided (consciously or unconsciously) to validate the qualifier "black". That is, you feel race (as opposed to, say, gender or sexual orientation or education or shoe size) is a relevant factor in the dismal conditions in Rhodisia. Of course, I already stated this above.

Scarlett - If you agree with everything he says, you are clearly racist.

I did validate the "Black" qualifier and consciously so. For me, Black rule = democracy and it is that which I oppose or would have opposed. It was an insane proposition to hand power over to an uneducated Black majority. I wasn't old enough to voice support for apartheid South Africa but I would have on those grounds. I can see how my sentiments were easily and quickly misconstrued into something like, " stupid Negroes can't maintain a modern state". That is my fault and though I try never to come off that way for several reasons I have failed here.

That said, I have made my thoughts on race and intelligence known as well as my views on evolutionary psychology. I do believe that there are significant differences in IQ between groups as there are significant group differences in a host of other traits (e.g. child rearing, strength, speed, and susceptibility to disease) and that this has real world ramifications. If it is this that troubles you in the end then by your definition you may consider me a racist.

[BIGTEX]

Stating that one believes that there are significant differences in IQ is the equivalent of one stating that energy comes from the sun.

In other words, it is stating an obvious, irrefutable truth.

[Mr. Dirlewanger]

Stating that one believes that there are significant differences in IQ is the equivalent of one stating that energy comes from the sun.

In other words, it is stating an obvious, irrefutable truth.

The whole egalitarian edifice will come crashing down in the coming years and I will greet that with joy as it was all a lie from day one.

Bigtex, 'tis best to tread lightly. The psychological blow to Western society will be immense and the fallout will make for an ugly scene. It will no doubt be exploited by racists and I fear that this will make the transition that much harder.

[SDML]

I did validate the "Black" qualifier and consciously so. For me, Black rule = democracy and it is that which I oppose or would have opposed. It was an insane proposition to hand power over to an uneducated Black majority. I wasn't old enough to voice support for apartheid South Africa but I would have on those grounds. I can see how my sentiments were easily and quickly misconstrued into something like, " stupid Negroes can't maintain a modern state". That is my fault and though I try never to come off that way for several reasons I have failed here.

Is that a PC way of saying you oppose equality because some people don't have enough education or the proper skin color to be equal?

That said, I have made my thoughts on race and intelligence known as well as my views on evolutionary psychology. I do believe that there are significant differences in IQ between groups as there are significant group differences in a host of other traits (e.g. child rearing, strength, speed, and susceptibility to disease) and that this has real world ramifications. If it is this that troubles you in the end then by your definition you may consider me a racist.

I must have missed those posts. I assume you're too busy to re-iterate, so perhaps you could direct me to those particular posts.

That said, if IQ is the sole criteria you embrace, then you need to move into the 21st century, my friend. I would suggest you start with Gardner's "Frames of Mind" (a discussion of his multiple intelligence model) or similar.

[they call me MR. GRUMPY god damn it!]

Stating that one believes that there are significant differences in IQ is the equivalent of one stating that energy comes from the sun.

In other words, it is stating an obvious, irrefutable truth.

  pull your head out of your ass before that methane kills the couple of brain cells you have left

[']

can you get high on methane? spunk wants to know 

[Peter1469]

IQ is certainly not the “end all” quantifiable trait of a human.  IQ may measure the upper limits of a person’s skill set.  But it doesn’t have much to do with how well the person performs in tasks within their competence level.  I would much rather hire someone with average intelligence who has a strong work ethic and desire to succeed than to hire a genius who is an underachiever and pain-in-the-ass. 

I think that methane could starve your brain of oxygen.  That may give you a high.