What spunkloaf is sick of.

[bored]

You're about as black as your klan hood. ;D;D
I wouldn't be surprised if you're an albino.

[spunkloaf]

You have good advice bored.  You are correct.

I get very emotionally attached to what I stand for.  Kinda thought that was the point.  Apparently, it just draws more negative attention.  So I guess it pays to be more or less emotionally transparent.

Working on it.

[bored]

You'll be better off in the end I guaruntee it. Politics are fun and exciting but it can seriously ruin peoples mood in the face of opposition.

[spunkloaf]

I agree.

[trex]

I disagree bored.  I, for one, have not accused people on this site of anything--unless it was out of sarcasm for something they accused me of.  I get very spiteful sometimes.  The other day I said republicans and conservatives should be rounded up and killed.    But, Pitty said before that the liberals should be deported.

Sorry to hear what happened in your neighborhood.  I hardly count tearing down Bush signs as violence though.  And remember, he is un-popular with many parties--it might not have been the left side who did that.

And your Kerry supporters?  Yeah, that seemed a bit blunt--but people do literally take it that way.  People against the war call it murder.  And if your kids are in the military, Bush is murdering them by sending them to an unnecessary war.  That's not how I see it though.




Anyways, to contradict what you said (because that is, aparently, what I am known most for), I personally have not heard people (on these boards) talk about race who ARE ON THE LEFT.  THE RIGHT talks about race SO much more, and in so many more ways, then they claim the left is being racist for not letting them speak their mind. 

I don't know.  You have a good point.  But the right is being brutal.  Just brutal.  And it IS personal.  This is not about politics anymore.  It's about spunkloaf being called a lazy momma's boy who only makes 9.25 an hour.

None of it is true.  But because somebody else said it, that's what sticks.  And now, that's who I am to people.  I hate it.  All because of my political view.  What have I done or said to anybody else about their personal lives?

Dude I beleiev you used the whole month of april and may to refer to me as a racist?

[spunkloaf]

Because you were using racially charged attacks on Obama, as you still are doing.  You and D-wang agreed on racially charged statistics AGAINST other races while ignoring white statistics.  But you don't do that anymore, and D-wang has slowed on it.

I saw that as racist on some level.  But I said I will not call you racist anymore.

[spunkloaf]

Where did I call you racist in April and May?

I don't really recall.

[conleys ghost]

for what its worth spunk i dont measure you by how much you make an hour...and i dont believe people on here think of you the way you maybe perceive them to (in a negative way)...shoot just look at your karma hehe

it did bother me when you said conservatives should be rounded up and shot. but i know you didnt mean it, just like i and many others on here have said things in the heat of anger that we didn't mean. its our passion (and booze ;-) that get us fired up -- if none of us cared about america then we wouldn't be here yelling about it, dagnabbit!

[Mr. Dirlewanger]

Because you were using racially charged attacks on Obama, as you still are doing.  You and D-wang agreed on racially charged statistics AGAINST other races while ignoring white statistics.  But you don't do that anymore, and D-wang has slowed on it.

I saw that as racist on some level.  But I said I will not call you racist anymore.

The truth isn't against anything. What stats did I ignore? "D-Wang" has slowed up on it because "D-Wang" was right and made his point well. The liberal lies regarding race have been exposed and the sacred cow has been tipped.  I do not wish to slay the slain, so to speak.

[conleys ghost]

d-wang do you not like the name "d-wang" ??  would you prefer something more formal?

[trex]

Because you were using racially charged attacks on Obama, as you still are doing.  You and D-wang agreed on racially charged statistics AGAINST other races while ignoring white statistics.  But you don't do that anymore, and D-wang has slowed on it.

I saw that as racist on some level.  But I said I will not call you racist anymore.

Wrong. Incorrect. Deluded

[trex]

Where did I call you racist in April and May?

I don't really recall.

Dont you remember the whole war like deabte we had.  You know like the one you kinda been having with d?

You called me a racsit..... I never said Obama cant be president because he is black that is racism.

Being asgainst a candidate because he is a con man isnt racist.

Being against a liberal candidate is not racist.

[Mr. Dirlewanger]

d-wang do you not like the name "d-wang" ??  would you prefer something more formal?

If you can't beat 'em join 'em. 

[conleys ghost]

d-wang do you not like the name "d-wang" ??  would you prefer something more formal?

If you can't beat 'em join 'em. 

 

personally i think d-wang is hilarious!

[spunkloaf]

d-wang do you not like the name "d-wang" ??  would you prefer something more formal?

If you can't beat 'em join 'em. 

 

personally i think d-wang is hilarious!

Dirlewanger is too long for me to type all the time, and I refer to D-wang lots.

I think both names are hilarious.