Peter1469
VIP
Imperial Grand Poobah Ranter
   
Karma 151
Offline
Posts: 4733
|
 |
« on: July 23, 2008, 03:53:07 AM » |
|
http://brain-terminal.com/posts/2008/07/22/socialism The nearby chart shows that the top 1% of taxpayers, those who earn above $388,806, paid 40% of all income taxes in 2006, the highest share in at least 40 years. The top 10% in income, those earning more than $108,904, paid 71%. [...] Americans with an income below the median paid a record low 2.9% of all income taxes, while the top 50% paid 97.1%. [...] Aha, we are told: The rich paid more taxes because they made a greater share of the money. That is true. The top 1% earned 22% of all reported income. But they also paid a share of taxes not far from double their share of income. In other words, the tax code is already steeply progressive.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Alea iacta est
|
|
|
they call me MR. GRUMPY god damn it!
VIP
Imperial Grand Poobah Ranter
   
Karma 666
Offline
Posts: 5698
Kill them! Kill them twice!
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: July 23, 2008, 06:40:05 AM » |
|
this is an argument for a flat tax and immediate cut in discretionary spending by 5-10%
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"The pacifist is as surely a traitor to his country and to humanity as is the most brutal wrongdoer."
|
|
|
SDML
VIP
Grand Poobah Ranter
   
Karma 50
Offline
Posts: 1215
|
 |
« Reply #2 on: July 23, 2008, 07:49:34 AM » |
|
No, this is an argument for the ridiculousness of people's use of the word "progressive". It is an argument for tossing out the entire tax code, along with the personal income tax, and a giant cut in government spending.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Gunit Hussein Sangh
VIP
Imperial Grand Poobah Ranter
   
Karma 82
Offline
Posts: 2714
RIP GOP
|
 |
« Reply #3 on: July 23, 2008, 09:46:14 AM » |
|
Yeah ... and just think of how much they would be paying if there wasn't all those loopholes where they can move their money into offshore accounts and hide it from the IRS!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
 Obama 360 and rising -- McSame 178. America will once again rise from the ashes of a Bush.
|
|
|
conley
VIP
Imperial Grand Poobah Ranter
   
Karma 203
Offline
Posts: 4106
OmegaMan
|
 |
« Reply #4 on: July 23, 2008, 09:50:30 AM » |
|
cry me a river...these guys pay a disproportionate amount of taxes because they have a disproportionate amount of wealth. they're lucky taxes are so low, because if they lived any where else in the civilized world they would be A LOT higher. not to mention the current rate is at a very low point historically speaking: # During World War I the top rate rose to 77%; after the war, the top rate was scaled down to a low of 25%. # During the Great Depression and World War II, the top income tax rate rose again. In the Internal Revenue Code of 1939, the top rate was 75%. The top rate reached 94% during the war and remained at 91% until 1964. (!!!!!!) # In 1964 the top rate was decreased to 70% (1964 Revenue Act), then to 50% in 1981 (Economic Recovery Tax Act or ERTA). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Income_tax_in_the_United_States
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
SDML
VIP
Grand Poobah Ranter
   
Karma 50
Offline
Posts: 1215
|
 |
« Reply #5 on: July 23, 2008, 11:14:49 AM » |
|
Raising the rate to 3/4+ of one's income is a HUGE incentive to find loopholes, not to mention to hide MOST of one's income. For that matter, a rate of 25% is a huge incentive when one realizes that it means you work 1/4 of the year (3 months) just to pay the government.
A personal income tax is a stupid idea that punishes productivity.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
OswaldTheOsprey
VIP
Imperial Grand Poobah Ranter
   
Karma 320
Offline
Posts: 6360
|
 |
« Reply #6 on: July 23, 2008, 11:40:00 AM » |
|
cry me a river...these guys pay a disproportionate amount of taxes because they have a disproportionate amount of wealth. they're lucky taxes are so low, because if they lived any where else in the civilized world they would be A LOT higher. not to mention the current rate is at a very low point historically speaking: # During World War I the top rate rose to 77%; after the war, the top rate was scaled down to a low of 25%. # During the Great Depression and World War II, the top income tax rate rose again. In the Internal Revenue Code of 1939, the top rate was 75%. The top rate reached 94% during the war and remained at 91% until 1964. (!!!!!!) # In 1964 the top rate was decreased to 70% (1964 Revenue Act), then to 50% in 1981 (Economic Recovery Tax Act or ERTA). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Income_tax_in_the_United_StatesExcellent post. Please do not forget that most of wealthy are internationalists who put the bottom line over our Motherland. OswaldTheOsprey
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Urbi et Orbi
|
|
|
Vermouth
VIP
Imperial Grand Poobah Ranter
   
Karma 35
Offline
Posts: 2527
|
 |
« Reply #7 on: July 23, 2008, 07:05:49 PM » |
|
Raising the rate to 3/4+ of one's income is a HUGE incentive to find loopholes, not to mention to hide MOST of one's income. For that matter, a rate of 25% is a huge incentive when one realizes that it means you work 1/4 of the year (3 months) just to pay the government.
A personal income tax is a stupid idea that punishes productivity.
It's not 3/4 of your entire income. It's 3/4 of your income that's in the highest bracket. According to the link, the current highest bracket is 35%, and the rate kicks in at $357,701. You're only paying 35% on the portion of your income that's over $357,701.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
conley
VIP
Imperial Grand Poobah Ranter
   
Karma 203
Offline
Posts: 4106
OmegaMan
|
 |
« Reply #8 on: July 23, 2008, 07:21:27 PM » |
|
Raising the rate to 3/4+ of one's income is a HUGE incentive to find loopholes, not to mention to hide MOST of one's income. For that matter, a rate of 25% is a huge incentive when one realizes that it means you work 1/4 of the year (3 months) just to pay the government.
A personal income tax is a stupid idea that punishes productivity.
It's not 3/4 of your entire income. It's 3/4 of your income that's in the highest bracket. According to the link, the current highest bracket is 35%, and the rate kicks in at $357,701. You're only paying 35% on the portion of your income that's over $357,701. Great point Vemouth doesn't say much but when she does she usually nails it.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
they call me MR. GRUMPY god damn it!
VIP
Imperial Grand Poobah Ranter
   
Karma 666
Offline
Posts: 5698
Kill them! Kill them twice!
|
 |
« Reply #9 on: July 23, 2008, 08:00:12 PM » |
|
any discussion of taxes and tax rates should begin with and only after the govt is forced to curtail spending beyond it's constitutional authority. that said this nation does not benefit from class warfare as justification to redistribute wealth and maintain political power.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"The pacifist is as surely a traitor to his country and to humanity as is the most brutal wrongdoer."
|
|
|
conley
VIP
Imperial Grand Poobah Ranter
   
Karma 203
Offline
Posts: 4106
OmegaMan
|
 |
« Reply #10 on: July 23, 2008, 08:14:47 PM » |
|
any discussion of taxes and tax rates should begin with and only after the govt is forced to curtail spending beyond it's constitutional authority.
no bid defense contracts? or are you railing against the .0001% spent on healthcare, education,. etc??
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Gunit Hussein Sangh
VIP
Imperial Grand Poobah Ranter
   
Karma 82
Offline
Posts: 2714
RIP GOP
|
 |
« Reply #11 on: July 23, 2008, 08:23:58 PM » |
|
any attempt to eliminate no-bid contracts to wealthy campaign contributors is un-american 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
 Obama 360 and rising -- McSame 178. America will once again rise from the ashes of a Bush.
|
|
|
OswaldTheOsprey
VIP
Imperial Grand Poobah Ranter
   
Karma 320
Offline
Posts: 6360
|
 |
« Reply #12 on: July 23, 2008, 09:01:11 PM » |
|
any discussion of taxes and tax rates should begin with and only after the govt is forced to curtail spending beyond it's constitutional authority. that said this nation does not benefit from class warfare as justification to redistribute wealth and maintain political power.
Hold the presses! Give me re-write! Grumpy is actually coming out against warfare! Oh wait, hold the phone! It is actually a form of warfare that doesn't involve mass killing. Tax them! Tax them twice!  OswaldTheOsprey
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Urbi et Orbi
|
|
|
Peter1469
VIP
Imperial Grand Poobah Ranter
   
Karma 151
Offline
Posts: 4733
|
 |
« Reply #13 on: July 23, 2008, 09:31:50 PM » |
|
Raising the rate to 3/4+ of one's income is a HUGE incentive to find loopholes, not to mention to hide MOST of one's income. For that matter, a rate of 25% is a huge incentive when one realizes that it means you work 1/4 of the year (3 months) just to pay the government.
A personal income tax is a stupid idea that punishes productivity.
It's not 3/4 of your entire income. It's 3/4 of your income that's in the highest bracket. According to the link, the current highest bracket is 35%, and the rate kicks in at $357,701. You're only paying 35% on the portion of your income that's over $357,701. But you are paying a progressively smaller amount on your income below the 35% threshold. There is a fundamental problem with the bottom 50% pay 2.9% of the income taxes.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Alea iacta est
|
|
|
Vermouth
VIP
Imperial Grand Poobah Ranter
   
Karma 35
Offline
Posts: 2527
|
 |
« Reply #14 on: July 24, 2008, 10:25:14 AM » |
|
Raising the rate to 3/4+ of one's income is a HUGE incentive to find loopholes, not to mention to hide MOST of one's income. For that matter, a rate of 25% is a huge incentive when one realizes that it means you work 1/4 of the year (3 months) just to pay the government.
A personal income tax is a stupid idea that punishes productivity.
It's not 3/4 of your entire income. It's 3/4 of your income that's in the highest bracket. According to the link, the current highest bracket is 35%, and the rate kicks in at $357,701. You're only paying 35% on the portion of your income that's over $357,701. But you are paying a progressively smaller amount on your income below the 35% threshold. There is a fundamental problem with the bottom 50% pay 2.9% of the income taxes. What's the problem? Even with a flat tax rate, more tax revenue will be coming from the wealthy than from the poor. The poor can't contribute funds they don't have.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|