Politirant: Political Discussion Forums and Politics Message Boards
November 23, 2008, 06:39:32 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Welcome to Politirant!
If this is your first visit, please register to start posting!
 
   Home   Help Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: FEC allows Senator Vitter to use campaign funds for prostitution defense  (Read 77 times)
Vermouth
VIP
Imperial Grand Poobah Ranter
*****

Karma 35
Offline Offline

Posts: 2507



« on: August 24, 2008, 04:40:58 PM »

From the same article ...

"At its meeting, the commission also punted on another high-profile issue — whether Sen. David Vitter can use his campaign funds to cover legal costs associated with his highly publicized entanglement in the trial of “D.C. Madam” Deborah Palfrey.

The Louisiana Republican has spent more than $200,000 on lawyers in connection with the trial and a related Senate Ethics Committee investigation conducted after his phone number turned up among Palfrey’s records in 2007.

The commission split three-to-three on the request, with the Democrats on the panel backing a draft opinion by FEC officials that he be allowed to use some of the money to pay only for legal counsel in the ethics investigation and for so-called “press relation” expenses arising from the Palfrey trial. Those costs were estimated at $31,000.

The Republicans, however, backed a second opinion suggesting that all of the expenses Vitter incurred were related to his status as a public official. Commissioner Matthew Peterson said Vitter was drawn into the case because of his status as a congressman, making the expenses political rather than personal.

“I think pretty plainly the expenses at issue resulted from pretty unofficial activities,” Weintraub retorted.

In the end, the commission could agree only that Vitter could use funds related to his Ethics Committee investigation but left open the question of whether campaign funds could be applied to the rest of his legal expenses. That is now left up to the Ethics Committee, which normally looks to the FEC for guidance. It is possible that the panel will rule Vitter can use his campaign money to cover all his costs."
Logged
OswaldTheOsprey
VIP
Imperial Grand Poobah Ranter
*****

Karma 320
Offline Offline

Posts: 6061



« Reply #1 on: August 24, 2008, 04:56:08 PM »

What a repulsive pig. Angry Angry Angry

OswaldTheOsprey
Logged

Urbi et Orbi
Peter1469
VIP
Imperial Grand Poobah Ranter
*****

Karma 150
Offline Offline

Posts: 4588



« Reply #2 on: August 24, 2008, 05:03:49 PM »

With the history of our political representation, how can anyone say with a straight face that such expenses are not “official?”
Logged

Alea iacta est
OswaldTheOsprey
VIP
Imperial Grand Poobah Ranter
*****

Karma 320
Offline Offline

Posts: 6061



« Reply #3 on: August 24, 2008, 05:38:10 PM »

With the history of our political representation, how can anyone say with a straight face that such expenses are not “official?”

A better term would "usual expense"! Wink

OswaldTheOsprey
Logged

Urbi et Orbi
Peter1469
VIP
Imperial Grand Poobah Ranter
*****

Karma 150
Offline Offline

Posts: 4588



« Reply #4 on: August 24, 2008, 08:51:17 PM »

Indeed
Logged

Alea iacta est
Wowster
Grand Poobah Ranter
****

Karma -92
Offline Offline

Posts: 1031



« Reply #5 on: August 24, 2008, 09:15:20 PM »

From the same article ...

"At its meeting, the commission also punted on another high-profile issue — whether Sen. David Vitter can use his campaign funds to cover legal costs associated with his highly publicized entanglement in the trial of “D.C. Madam” Deborah Palfrey.

The Louisiana Republican has spent more than $200,000 on lawyers in connection with the trial and a related Senate Ethics Committee investigation conducted after his phone number turned up among Palfrey’s records in 2007.

The commission split three-to-three on the request, with the Democrats on the panel backing a draft opinion by FEC officials that he be allowed to use some of the money to pay only for legal counsel in the ethics investigation and for so-called “press relation” expenses arising from the Palfrey trial. Those costs were estimated at $31,000.

The Republicans, however, backed a second opinion suggesting that all of the expenses Vitter incurred were related to his status as a public official. Commissioner Matthew Peterson said Vitter was drawn into the case because of his status as a congressman, making the expenses political rather than personal.

“I think pretty plainly the expenses at issue resulted from pretty unofficial activities,” Weintraub retorted.

In the end, the commission could agree only that Vitter could use funds related to his Ethics Committee investigation but left open the question of whether campaign funds could be applied to the rest of his legal expenses. That is now left up to the Ethics Committee, which normally looks to the FEC for guidance. It is possible that the panel will rule Vitter can use his campaign money to cover all his costs."
How is that investigation going into Palfrey's murder, I mean suicide?  Roll Eyes
Logged

The United States of Indentured Servants
OswaldTheOsprey
VIP
Imperial Grand Poobah Ranter
*****

Karma 320
Offline Offline

Posts: 6061



« Reply #6 on: August 24, 2008, 10:04:30 PM »

From the same article ...

"At its meeting, the commission also punted on another high-profile issue — whether Sen. David Vitter can use his campaign funds to cover legal costs associated with his highly publicized entanglement in the trial of “D.C. Madam” Deborah Palfrey.

The Louisiana Republican has spent more than $200,000 on lawyers in connection with the trial and a related Senate Ethics Committee investigation conducted after his phone number turned up among Palfrey’s records in 2007.

The commission split three-to-three on the request, with the Democrats on the panel backing a draft opinion by FEC officials that he be allowed to use some of the money to pay only for legal counsel in the ethics investigation and for so-called “press relation” expenses arising from the Palfrey trial. Those costs were estimated at $31,000.

The Republicans, however, backed a second opinion suggesting that all of the expenses Vitter incurred were related to his status as a public official. Commissioner Matthew Peterson said Vitter was drawn into the case because of his status as a congressman, making the expenses political rather than personal.

“I think pretty plainly the expenses at issue resulted from pretty unofficial activities,” Weintraub retorted.

In the end, the commission could agree only that Vitter could use funds related to his Ethics Committee investigation but left open the question of whether campaign funds could be applied to the rest of his legal expenses. That is now left up to the Ethics Committee, which normally looks to the FEC for guidance. It is possible that the panel will rule Vitter can use his campaign money to cover all his costs."
How is that investigation going into Palfrey's murder, I mean suicide?  Roll Eyes

Very slowly with all due caution I'm sure. Wink
Logged

Urbi et Orbi
Peter1469
VIP
Imperial Grand Poobah Ranter
*****

Karma 150
Offline Offline

Posts: 4588



« Reply #7 on: August 24, 2008, 10:11:48 PM »

She was extremely naive to believe that any other fate awaited her- with her list of clients. 
Logged

Alea iacta est
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.5 | SMF © 2006-2008, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Critical
	Acclaim Linksgrower

(c) 2008 Politirant | All Rights Reserved