Politirant: Political Discussion Forums and Politics Message Boards
December 01, 2008, 08:55:25 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Welcome to Politirant!
If this is your first visit, please register to start posting!
 
   Home   Help Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: House Judiciary Committee to Hear Kucinich Impeachment Resolution on Friday  (Read 109 times)
Lookout
Senior Ranter
***

Karma -14
Offline Offline

Posts: 526



« on: July 24, 2008, 08:27:18 PM »

July 23, 2008

Now we're getting somewhere!

 
  http://www.infowars.com/?p=3521
 
On Friday, Dennis Kucinich will take his impeachment resolution against Bush to the House Judiciary Committee. Kucinich argues that Bush has violated his oath of office, violated U.S. and international law, has trashed the Constitution, and poses a serious threat to the nation. “I want to thank you for the support which you have given to my efforts to hold this administration accountable for taking us into a war based on lies, and for the destruction of the rule of law and the destruction of cherished Constitutional principles,” Kucinich says in the YouTube video posted here.

On July 10, Kucinich pared down his 35 articles of impeachment to one and the House voted 238 to 180 to send this single article to the Judiciary Committee, which buried Kucinich’s previous 35-article effort in June. Democrat leaders of the House have promised not to discuss impeachment during the proceedings, thus attempting to derail the constitutional process required to initiate impeachment. Instead of beginning the impeachment process, Democrats have decided to conduct what the Los Angeles Times calls “an election-year review” of Bush’s abuse of power. “The hearing is a modest gesture by House Democratic leaders to members like Kucinich who insist that Bush’s reasons for going to war meet the standard for impeachment,” the LA Times reported on July 16.

Recall House Speaker Nancy Pelosi declaring after the Democrats swept the elections in 2006 that “impeachment is off the table.” On July 10, Pelosi said Kucinich’s article is “a Judiciary Committee matter, and I believe we will see some attention being paid to it by the Judiciary Committee.” On Friday we shall see if she really means it or if she is simply attempting to placate those of us who believe impeachment is long over due.

 
 
 
Mr. Kucinich should be commended for his persistent effort to bring Bush and his coterie of neocons to justice for their crimes. After a House committee buried his impeachment resolution, he turned around an introduced another one and has promised to continue to do so until action is taken. “Citizens can either sit back and hope for more blips to appear on the radar, or we can make them appear by asking Rep. Heath Shuler to cosponsor Kucinich’s bill, to encourage Judiciary Committee Chair Conyers to hold hearings and to ask Speaker Pelosi to move this business forward,” writes Kim Carlyle of Veterans for Peace.

Chairman John Conyers has said he wants public discussion of the issues being raised by Kucinich, but does not plan to take any action. “We’re not doing impeachment, but he can talk about it,” Conyers told CQ Politics. Kucinich’s earlier resolutions were referred to Conyers’ committee, which took no action on them. After the 2006 election, when the Democrats gained control of Congress, Conyers said impeachment would be politically untenable. Prior to this, he appeared to be an impeachment advocate. Last August, however, Conyers said “Nancy Pelosi has impeachment ‘off the table,’ but that’s off her table, it is not off John Conyers’ table.” On Friday, we will likely get more clarification.
Logged
conley
VIP
Imperial Grand Poobah Ranter
*****

Karma 203
Offline Offline

Posts: 4106


OmegaMan


« Reply #1 on: July 24, 2008, 08:28:38 PM »

awwwwwww yeah MOOSESEX

 Grin Cheesy Grin
Logged
DF
Newbie Ranter


Karma 0
Offline Offline

Posts: 11


« Reply #2 on: July 24, 2008, 08:32:39 PM »

If King George II is impeached, Prince Dick will become president. Who wants that?
Logged
Lookout
Senior Ranter
***

Karma -14
Offline Offline

Posts: 526



« Reply #3 on: July 24, 2008, 08:38:30 PM »

No one...with any sence. Just those with cents!
The impeach process is mearly a formality to persue after office for crimes against the American public and the constitution and murder. There is a new book out tittled "The prosecution of G.W.B. for murder.
Since the war in Irag was and is illegal, that means he is responsable for over 1 million murders. Not to mention the 3000 Americans that died sept 11 2001. Eventually the whole criminal profiteering gang will be brought to their knees before the American people.
Logged
DF
Newbie Ranter


Karma 0
Offline Offline

Posts: 11


« Reply #4 on: July 24, 2008, 08:42:19 PM »

No one...with any sence. Just those with cents!
The impeach process is mearly a formality to persue after office for crimes against the American public and the constitution and murder. There is a new book out tittled "The prosecution of G.W.B. for murder.
Since the war in Irag was and is illegal, that means he is responsable for over 1 million murders. Not to mention the 3000 Americans that died sept 11 2001. Eventually the whole criminal profiteering gang will be brought to their knees before the American people.

Oh, so you’re one of those guys that believes the government pulled off the 9/11 attacks. I see. What are you smoking, and where can I get some?

Get a life. Stop hiding out in your mother’s basement and get a life.
Logged
Lookout
Senior Ranter
***

Karma -14
Offline Offline

Posts: 526



« Reply #5 on: July 24, 2008, 08:45:16 PM »

If you have something to negate all the overwhelming evidence, I would love to hear it. Or if you have something constructive to add or even dispute in a intelligent format, I would be most interested.
Logged
DF
Newbie Ranter


Karma 0
Offline Offline

Posts: 11


« Reply #6 on: July 24, 2008, 08:49:18 PM »

If you have something to negate all the overwhelming evidence, I would love to hear it. Or if you have something constructive to add or even dispute in a intelligent format, I would be most interested.

If you would put down the marijuana and pick up a book (something not written by a crackpot liberal, maybe) I might be willing to talk to you, but until then, any efforts to have a conversation with you would be like trying to have a conversation with a six year old.
Logged
Lookout
Senior Ranter
***

Karma -14
Offline Offline

Posts: 526



« Reply #7 on: July 24, 2008, 08:56:12 PM »

If you have something to negate all the overwhelming evidence, I would love to hear it. Or if you have something constructive to add or even dispute in a intelligent format, I would be most interested.

If you would put down the marijuana and pick up a book (something not written by a crackpot liberal, maybe) I might be willing to talk to you, but until then, any efforts to have a conversation with you would be like trying to have a conversation with a six year old.

I don't know why you are such an angry person, or why you throw out untrue acusations. I don't know why someone would automatically disqualify themselves from an intelligent discussion on a topic on a mesage board either. I will not be pulled into your nomenclature or subjectivism on a personal level. I hope you cheer up or get some good news or something.
Logged
conley
VIP
Imperial Grand Poobah Ranter
*****

Karma 203
Offline Offline

Posts: 4106


OmegaMan


« Reply #8 on: July 24, 2008, 09:06:19 PM »

If you have something to negate all the overwhelming evidence, I would love to hear it. Or if you have something constructive to add or even dispute in a intelligent format, I would be most interested.

If you would put down the marijuana and pick up a book (something not written by a crackpot liberal, maybe) I might be willing to talk to you, but until then, any efforts to have a conversation with you would be like trying to have a conversation with a six year old.

I don't know why you are such an angry person, or why you throw out untrue acusations. I don't know why someone would automatically disqualify themselves from an intelligent discussion on a topic on a mesage board either. I will not be pulled into your nomenclature or subjectivism on a personal level. I hope you cheer up or get some good news or something.

lookout i mocked you about the moosesex but i must applaud you for this post. well done, seriously!
Logged
Lookout
Senior Ranter
***

Karma -14
Offline Offline

Posts: 526



« Reply #9 on: July 24, 2008, 09:20:25 PM »

If you have something to negate all the overwhelming evidence, I would love to hear it. Or if you have something constructive to add or even dispute in a intelligent format, I would be most interested.

If you would put down the marijuana and pick up a book (something not written by a crackpot liberal, maybe) I might be willing to talk to you, but until then, any efforts to have a conversation with you would be like trying to have a conversation with a six year old.

I don't know why you are such an angry person, or why you throw out untrue acusations. I don't know why someone would automatically disqualify themselves from an intelligent discussion on a topic on a mesage board either. I will not be pulled into your nomenclature or subjectivism on a personal level. I hope you cheer up or get some good news or something.

lookout i mocked you about the moosesex but i must applaud you for this post. well done, seriously!

Thanks Ghost, and I thought the MOOSESEX was hilarious. Good to hear from you again.
Logged
conley
VIP
Imperial Grand Poobah Ranter
*****

Karma 203
Offline Offline

Posts: 4106


OmegaMan


« Reply #10 on: July 24, 2008, 09:51:06 PM »

If you have something to negate all the overwhelming evidence, I would love to hear it. Or if you have something constructive to add or even dispute in a intelligent format, I would be most interested.

If you would put down the marijuana and pick up a book (something not written by a crackpot liberal, maybe) I might be willing to talk to you, but until then, any efforts to have a conversation with you would be like trying to have a conversation with a six year old.

I don't know why you are such an angry person, or why you throw out untrue acusations. I don't know why someone would automatically disqualify themselves from an intelligent discussion on a topic on a mesage board either. I will not be pulled into your nomenclature or subjectivism on a personal level. I hope you cheer up or get some good news or something.

lookout i mocked you about the moosesex but i must applaud you for this post. well done, seriously!

Thanks Ghost, and I thought the MOOSESEX was hilarious. Good to hear from you again.

oh i thought it was hilarious too...  Wink
Logged
j.griffiths25
Newbie Ranter


Karma 0
Offline Offline

Posts: 15


Workers of the world, unite!


« Reply #11 on: July 24, 2008, 10:54:30 PM »

Dennis Kucinich is a courageous individual to stand up and fight for the good of the people. The world would be better off without a President Bush.
Logged
SDML
VIP
Grand Poobah Ranter
*****

Karma 50
Offline Offline

Posts: 1215


« Reply #12 on: July 25, 2008, 07:16:41 PM »

To no avail.

Dennis is a good man, but he typically picks fights he cannot win.
Logged
conley
VIP
Imperial Grand Poobah Ranter
*****

Karma 203
Offline Offline

Posts: 4106


OmegaMan


« Reply #13 on: July 25, 2008, 07:19:22 PM »

To no avail.

Dennis is a good man, but he typically picks fights he cannot win.

agreed...has he actually gotten anything done for the people of his district?
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.5 | SMF © 2006-2008, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Critical
	Acclaim Linksgrower

(c) 2008 Politirant | All Rights Reserved