Support Politirant Through Amazon
Visit our sister site at the Political Forums

Author Topic: Russia Describes Syrian Conflict as Civil War  (Read 5764 times)

Offline jgreer

  • Senior Ranter
  • ****
  • Thank Yous
  • -Given: 26
  • -Received: 26
  • Posts: 488
  • Karma: 32
Re: Russia Describes Syrian Conflict as Civil War
« Reply #50 on: November 19, 2011, 09:34:24 PM »
They waged war on everyone that doesnt mean anything, they did whatever they could to get more power

Thats why its called an empire!!
Vote Democrat Like Your Life Depends On It - It Does!!

Offline Mister D

  • V.I.P.
  • Imperial Grand Poobah Ranter
  • *
  • Thank Yous
  • -Given: 109
  • -Received: 164
  • Posts: 6114
  • Karma: 359
  • Egalitarianism is simply absurd
Re: Russia Describes Syrian Conflict as Civil War
« Reply #51 on: November 19, 2011, 09:36:35 PM »
They waged war on everyone that doesnt mean anything, they did whatever they could to get more power

Thats why its called an empire!!

Waging war on slavers wouldn't bring England more "power".
"Pushing people forward simply because of their colour, irrespective of merit, would be most unfortunate and would of course lead to disaster. It would mean that Rhodesia would then develop into a kind of banana republic where the country would in no time be bankrupt."


~Ian Smith

Offline jgreer

  • Senior Ranter
  • ****
  • Thank Yous
  • -Given: 26
  • -Received: 26
  • Posts: 488
  • Karma: 32
Re: Russia Describes Syrian Conflict as Civil War
« Reply #52 on: November 19, 2011, 09:43:15 PM »
They waged war on everyone that doesnt mean anything, they did whatever they could to get more power

Thats why its called an empire!!

Waging war on slavers wouldn't bring England more "power".

I mean winning wars doesnt matter if there are slaves or not.
Vote Democrat Like Your Life Depends On It - It Does!!

Offline Mister D

  • V.I.P.
  • Imperial Grand Poobah Ranter
  • *
  • Thank Yous
  • -Given: 109
  • -Received: 164
  • Posts: 6114
  • Karma: 359
  • Egalitarianism is simply absurd
Re: Russia Describes Syrian Conflict as Civil War
« Reply #53 on: November 19, 2011, 09:56:05 PM »
They waged war on everyone that doesnt mean anything, they did whatever they could to get more power

Thats why its called an empire!!

Waging war on slavers wouldn't bring England more "power".

I mean winning wars doesnt matter if there are slaves or not.

What does that have to do with your question?
"Pushing people forward simply because of their colour, irrespective of merit, would be most unfortunate and would of course lead to disaster. It would mean that Rhodesia would then develop into a kind of banana republic where the country would in no time be bankrupt."


~Ian Smith

 


Support Politirant Through Amazon